Peer Review

“The pen is the tongue of the mind.” – Horace

All submissions to our journal undergo a double-blind peer review process. This means that the identities of both the authors and the reviewers are kept confidential throughout the review process.

Review Process Overview:

  1. Initial Editorial Check – Submissions are first screened by the editorial team for suitability and basic formatting.

  2. Peer Review Assignment – Suitable manuscripts are sent to at least two expert reviewers in the field.

  3. Review Criteria – Reviewers evaluate based on originality, methodology, clarity, significance, and relevance.

  4. Reviewer Decision – The reviewers submit one of the following recommendations:

    • Accept

    • Minor Revisions

    • Major Revisions

    • Reject

  5. Final Decision – The Editor-in-Chief makes the final decision based on the reviewers’ feedback.

  6. Revision Process – Authors are given a chance to revise their manuscript before final acceptance.

 

We strive to ensure the integrity and quality of scholarly communication by conducting fair and constructive peer reviews.

Interested individuals may register officially through the website, ensuring they select the ‘Interested in Peer Review’ option. Once registered, they are encouraged to contact the Editorial Board via the email provided religionsjour-eng@dicid.org